{
  "schemaVersion": "1.0.0-public-snapshot",
  "id": "PRJ-GC-001",
  "displayId": "GC-001",
  "slug": "graph-cinema",
  "name": "Graph Cinema / Graphfield Runtime",
  "summary": "A trajectory-first runtime where graph history, admissible motion, sealed judgments, and repair receipts become first-class objects.",
  "purpose": "A trajectory-first runtime where graph history, admissible motion, sealed judgments, and repair receipts become first-class objects.",
  "regionId": "parallax-institute",
  "projectType": "Systems architecture",
  "status": "Exploring",
  "maturity": "Sprout",
  "evidenceClassification": "Research-grounded",
  "visibility": "public-candidate",
  "canonConfidence": "Core",
  "launchTier": "Tier 1",
  "paths": [
    "understand",
    "build",
    "collaborate",
    "wander"
  ],
  "tags": [
    "systems architecture",
    "receipts",
    "runtime"
  ],
  "claimBoundaryVersion": "1.1.0",
  "claimBoundary": {
    "supported": "The project has a defined trajectory-first architecture, role separation, governance logic, and ledger concept grounded in known graph and multi-agent engineering concerns.",
    "notClaimed": "The current work does not establish superior intelligence, unbiased governance, production reliability, or mathematical theorems beyond explicitly cited proofs."
  },
  "knownLimitations": [
    "The architecture is specified but not yet demonstrated as a production-scale runtime.",
    "Sealed roles do not guarantee true independence when underlying models or data are correlated.",
    "Admissibility rules can encode hidden human values and therefore require governance receipts.",
    "An interactive trajectory example and performance measurements are still missing."
  ],
  "currentState": {
    "summary": "Graph Cinema / Graphfield Runtime is recorded as Exploring at the Sprout stage. The inventory currently marks 4 artifact lanes Ready, 2 Partial, and 2 Missing.",
    "maturityStage": "Sprout",
    "maturityStageIndex": 1,
    "note": "B3 Tier 1 room draft · Core canon · Research-grounded evidence · public candidate"
  },
  "capabilities": [
    {
      "symbol": "▶",
      "title": "Models graph trajectories",
      "description": "Treats graph states as frames inside a governed sequence rather than isolated snapshots."
    },
    {
      "symbol": "▦",
      "title": "Separates Agent Offices",
      "description": "Observer, Cartographer, Protected Dissenter, Governor, Operator, and Repairer produce sealed judgments."
    },
    {
      "symbol": "⌁",
      "title": "Preserves continuity receipts",
      "description": "Records transitions, authority, competing interpretations, interventions, and repair in a ledger."
    }
  ],
  "architecture": {
    "summary": "A Graphfield emits candidate frames; Agent Offices evaluate admissible motion; governance selects or rejects transitions; the ledger preserves trajectory and repair.",
    "layers": [
      {
        "name": "Graphfield",
        "role": "State space, constraints, observations, and candidate transitions.",
        "status": "designed"
      },
      {
        "name": "Agent Office",
        "role": "Independent role judgments with protected disagreement.",
        "status": "designed"
      },
      {
        "name": "Trajectory governor",
        "role": "Admissibility, authority, and transition selection.",
        "status": "designed"
      },
      {
        "name": "Continuity ledger",
        "role": "Frames, judgments, actions, repairs, and lineage.",
        "status": "designed"
      }
    ]
  },
  "roadmap": [
    {
      "phase": "Now",
      "title": "Publish one canonical diagram",
      "description": "Show frame, graphfield, office judgments, trajectory, ledger, and repair in one readable flow."
    },
    {
      "phase": "Next",
      "title": "Build a deterministic trajectory demo",
      "description": "Let visitors inspect candidate transitions and sealed judgments step by step."
    },
    {
      "phase": "Later",
      "title": "Benchmark heterogeneous offices",
      "description": "Measure correlated failure, disagreement quality, latency, and repair behavior across model families."
    }
  ],
  "relatedProjectContext": [
    {
      "projectId": "PRJ-PI-001",
      "relationship": "Connected through: Research and governance architecture"
    },
    {
      "projectId": "PRJ-ALO-001",
      "relationship": "Trajectory ledger"
    },
    {
      "projectId": "PRJ-SOSA-001",
      "relationship": "Agent-office governance"
    }
  ],
  "contentStatus": "draft",
  "recordUpdatedAt": "2026-07-25",
  "sourceNote": "Public-safe static snapshot generated from the v0.4 B4 review registry. Source files and private working notes are not embedded."
}
