01
Origin condition
Why it exists
Systems often exchange conclusions without exchanging the evidence, assumptions, or readiness needed to trust them. SignalBridge exists to carry claims across tools and collaborators without converting confidence into authority or provenance into marketing.
Can two systems exchange useful evidence while preserving uncertainty, custody, and the right to reject the handoff?
02
Working system
What it does
- ⇄Packages evidence handoffs
Carries claim, source, method, confidence, boundary, and requested use together.
- ✓Tests agent readiness
Evaluates whether a sender can provide enough identity, provenance, and constraints for a receiving system.
- ⛔Refuses trust laundering
Prevents a receiver from treating a confident or well-formatted claim as verified authority.
03
System anatomy
Architecture
SignalBridge uses signed or inspectable envelopes, an agent-readiness rubric, proof runs, receiver validation, and ALO-compatible handoff receipts.
Signal envelope
Claim, evidence, provenance, confidence, scope, expiry, and requested action.
Readiness rubric
Identity, source access, method disclosure, boundaries, and correction behavior.
Receiver gate
Accept, reject, quarantine, request evidence, or narrow the claim.
Proof-run viewer
Human-readable comparison of sent evidence and accepted interpretation.
04
Present tense
Current state
SignalBridge is recorded as Active at the Growing stage. The inventory currently marks 4 artifact lanes Ready, 3 Partial, and 1 Missing.
B3 Tier 1 room draft · Core canon · Research-grounded evidence · public candidate
05
Honest edges
Known limitations
- A valid envelope does not guarantee the underlying evidence or interpretation is correct.
- Readiness rubrics can become checkbox theater unless tested adversarially.
- Cross-system identity and signatures require secure key custody.
- One clean interactive proof-run viewer is still missing.
06
Claim boundary · v1.1.0
What we are—and are not—saying
SignalBridge whitepaper v0.3, a Proof Run, and an agent-readiness rubric establish a documented evidence-exchange architecture.
SignalBridge is not universal interoperability, automatic verification, a certification authority, or proof that participating systems are trustworthy.
07
Development memory
Ledger
B3-SB-001-01SignalBridge whitepaper advanced to v0.3.
✓ DocumentedB3-SB-001-02Evidence handoff and agent-readiness rubric exercised in a bounded proof run.
✓ RecordedB3-SB-001-03Tier 1 room drafted around receiver rejection and trust-laundering limits.
✓ DraftCurated project receipts · source-file binding and human review remain pending
08
Directional, revisable
Roadmap
Freeze the public envelope example
Publish one complete claim, evidence, boundary, rejection, and correction sequence.
Build the proof-run viewer
Let a visitor compare what was sent, what was accepted, and what remained unresolved.
Test incompatible collaborators
Measure failure behavior when systems disagree about evidence, identity, or authority.
10
B10 evidence trail
Featured evidence
Registry-grounded trail
No primary source package is bound yet. The public trail is limited to the verified field card and public Genome snapshot.
SignalBridge — Project Field Card
B4-generated visual identity card built directly from the reviewed constellation registry.
Open bound artifactSignalBridge — Public Genome Snapshot
Public-safe JSON snapshot of the current project registry or expanded Project Genome.
Open bound artifact11
Publication intake
Artifacts & sources
SignalBridge Whitepaper v0.3
Evidence bridge and governance architecture.
View archive recordarchive:intake/signalbridge-whitepaper-v03SignalBridge Proof Run
Bounded evidence-handoff exercise.
View archive recordarchive:intake/signalbridge-proof-runInteractive Proof Run viewer
Required public centerpiece.
View archive recordarchive:intake/signalbridge-proof-viewerSource basis
archive:intake/signalbridge/source-basisarchive-canonportal:project/signalbridge@v0.4-b3planning-inventoryReview: Canon, claims, privacy, accessibility, and publication review · pending
12
Move with evidence
Next actions
Trust should be traceable through what the receiver accepted, rejected, and revised.
reviewReview the artifact registerSee which source packages, visuals, demonstrations, and public links are actually ready.
secondaryTrace related projectsFollow documented dependencies and neighboring systems without inventing connections.